Research Another Vehicle

Total NHTSA Complaints
11
Owner filings recorded
#1 Reported Problem
Body & Structure
5 reports (45.5%)
Crash Incident Reports
1
Filings citing a crash
Fire & Injury Reports
0
0 fire • 0 injury filings
Defect Investigation Analysis

Executive Problem Findings

AutoUtility currently tracks 11 official NHTSA owner defect complaints for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus. Body & Structure issues are the most frequently reported category, appearing in 5 complaints (45.5% of submitted records). Among these NHTSA complaint records, 1 filing cites a crash.

Methodology Notice: Consumer complaints are unverified voluntary submissions to the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI). Filings are not normalized for sales volume or vehicle mileage and do not constitute an audited component failure rate.
Incident & Severity Profile
  • • Total Owner Reports: 11 complaints submitted under federal penalty.
  • • Primary Subsystem: Body & Structure accounts for 45.5% of submissions (5 reports).
  • • Secondary Systems: Powertrain & Transmission (3), Brakes & Traction Control (1).
  • • Crash Incidents: 1 filings cite an impact or collision.
  • • Thermal Incidents: 0 filings cite smoke or fire.
  • • Reported Casualties: 0 injury filings • 0 fatality filings.
Category Distribution

Reported Defect Categories for 2022 Lincoln Nautilus

Factual proportion of owner complaints categorized by automotive subsystem in NHTSA records

Body & Structure
5
45.5%
Powertrain & Transmission
3
27.3%
Brakes & Traction Control
1
9.1%
Engine & Cooling
1
9.1%
Electrical System
1
9.1%
#1 45.5% SHARE

Body & Structure

5 owner complaints submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
#2 27.3% SHARE

Powertrain & Transmission

3 owner complaints submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
#3 9.1% SHARE

Brakes & Traction Control

1 owner complaint submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

⚠️ 1 Crash
#4 9.1% SHARE

Engine & Cooling

1 owner complaint submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

⚠️ 1 Crash
⚠️ 1 Associated Recall Campaign
Federal Oversight

Official NHTSA Defect Investigations (1)

Formal engineering analyses and preliminary evaluations opened by the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

ODI Action #EA23002 CLOSED Engineering Analysis (EA)
Opened: 2023-09-29 • Closed: 2024-10-31
Subject / Subsystem
Loss of Motive Power
Affected Component
ENGINE
Recall Linkage
On July 22, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) granted a Defect Petition (DP22001) and opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE22007) to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year (MY) 2021 Ford Bronco vehicles equipped with 2.7L EcoBoost engines. Complainants were reporting sudden engine failure while driving resulting in a loss of motive power, often without the ability to restart. During PE22007, the cause of engine failure and loss of motive power in the subject vehicles was determined to be intake valve fracture, and the full scope of vehicles affected by the subject defect was identified as all MY 2021-2022 Ford and Lincoln models equipped with either the 2.7L or 3.0L EcoBoost engines, referred to as the “Nano” engine family.  If an intake valve fractures in the subject engines, it may drop into the cylinder and contact the piston, often resulting in catastrophic engine damage. On September 29, 2023, PE22007 was upgraded to an Engineering Analysis (EA23002) to further investigate the subject defect across the full scope of affected vehicles. During EA23002, ODI visited Ford facilities to review technical information related to intake valve fracture in “Nano” engines, coordinated with NHTSA’s Vehicle Research and Testing Center (VRTC), and analyzed updated field data relating the subject defect. Forensic analysis of fractured intake valves demonstrated that the defective components exhibited “grinding burn” or out of specification hardness in the area of the keeper grooves. The presence of grinding burn is evidence that during the groove grinding phase of production, the temperature of the valve became sufficiently high to alter the microstructure of the material and is indicative that the valve supplier’s manufacturing processes were not within control specifications. Grinding burn results in a hard, brittle microstructure and high residual stresses toward the surface of the valve. Through normal engine loading, a valve with grinding burn will likely fracture at the area of highest vulnerability, which is the third keeper groove. In its response to the EA23002 Information Request (IR) letter, Ford provided evidence of 396 customer complaints (including field reports), 825 warranty claims, and 936 engine exchanges. When considering both ODI and manufacturer failure report data, there have been reports representing 1066 unique vehicles within the subject vehicle population. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that vehicles equipped with potentially defective intake valves were built within a production “spike period” of May 2021 – October 2021. The beginning of the spike period corresponds to a ramp up in production at the valve supplier manufacturing facility, and the end of the spike period aligns with the implementation of several mid-production process improvements and the decision to change the metal alloy used to produce intake valves from “Silchrome Lite” to “Silchrome 1”. Ford began investigating the subject defect in July 2021, determined the root cause, and took corrective measures for the new production vehicles. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that these corrective actions were successful in eliminating the risk of intake valve fracture for subject vehicles produced after October 2021. However, Ford did not take any field action to address vehicles produced during the spike period, and in the several months following the implementation of the production changes, a significant number of field failures continued to occur. It is Ford’s assessment that not all valves produced during the spike period are defective, and that failures associated with the subject defect occur at low time in service. Analysis of the failure report data demonstrates that the vast majority of failures have occurred before 20,000 miles with over half of all reported failures occurring before 5,000 miles. The rate of reported failures related to the subject defect has steadily decreased since November 2021. ODI coordinated with NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) to conduct statistical analysis and predict the number of future failures associated with the subject defect. The results of this analysis, and the trends identified through the failure report data are generally consistent with Ford’s assessment that defective intake valves will likely fail at a low time in service and indicate that the majority of subject vehicles equipped with defective valves have already experienced a failure. On August 23, 2024, Ford submitted recall 24V635 for subject vehicles equipped with “Nano” engines and built within the production spike period identified above (total population 90,736 vehicles). The remedy includes an inspection at a Ford/Lincoln dealership where the lifetime engine cycles of the vehicle will be determined. If a vehicle does not meet a threshold for lifetime engine cycles, the dealership will conduct a high RPM engine cycle accumulation procedure, which aims to identify if the vehicle is equipped with defective intake valves. Any vehicle that fails the accumulation procedure will receive an engine replacement under the recall. In addition to recall 24V635, Ford has stated that it will launch customer satisfaction campaign 24N12, which will provide extended warranty coverage to the subject vehicles through the earlier of 10 years or 150,000 miles. In view of the recall action being taken by Ford, ODI is closing this Engineering Analysis. To review the reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.
Consumer Filings

Recent NHTSA Owner Reports for 2022 Lincoln Nautilus

Representative defect filings submitted by owners to the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

Brakes & Traction Control ODI #11757247
Filed: 08/16/2026
⚠️ Crash Cited

"Unsure which individual or multiple system components failing. All occurred within 5 miles of home. Driving to destination noted that vehicle was acting or responding weird but did not show signs of any failure reported to daughter while speaking to her on the hands free system in vehicle but did..."

Body & Structure ODI #11757108
Filed: 08/15/2026
Defect Report

"The driver’s side front door inner sheet metal housing has suffered a severe structural failure where the door check-arm brackets mount to the vehicle frame. Under completely normal vehicle operation, the thin-gauge metal has cracked, buckled, and completely torn away from the inner door assembly...."

Body & Structure ODI #11754440
Filed: 08/03/2026
Defect Report

"Drivers side door hinge has completely broken away from interior side panel. This is a know manufacturing defect due to the weight of the door on this vehicle. We called dealership on 5/4/2026 after discovering issue, spoke with the service manager who advised us to bring vehicle to the dealership...."

Body & Structure ODI #11751759
Filed: 07/21/2026
Defect Report

"Spot welds in both front doors are failing. How would these cars do in a side impact with failing spot welds? The drivers door has approximately a 4" tear/crack around the broken spot welds."

Body & Structure ODI #11746052
Filed: 06/23/2026
Defect Report

"Lincoln Nautilus door hinge and check strap area of the driver's door has a significant crack which could lead to door failure in the event of a crash. Manufacture has issued a CSP (Customer Satisfaction Program 23B56. Year models 2022-2024. Mine is a 2022 but the VIN does not fall in the range of..."

Multi-Year Trend

Complaint History for Lincoln Nautilus

Reported defect complaint volume across sibling model years (2019–2026)

Model Year NHTSA Complaints Crash Reports Safety Recalls Detailed Report
2019 Lincoln Nautilus 100 2 8 View 2019 Problems →
2020 Lincoln Nautilus 32 2 5 View 2020 Problems →
2021 Lincoln Nautilus 20 1 2 View 2021 Problems →
2022 Lincoln Nautilus Current Page 11 1 2 Current
2023 Lincoln Nautilus 6 1 3 View 2023 Problems →
2024 Lincoln Nautilus 32 2 7 View 2024 Problems →
2025 Lincoln Nautilus 29 1 6 View 2025 Problems →
2026 Lincoln Nautilus 0 0 0 View 2026 Problems →
Exhaustive System Audit

Detailed NHTSA Component Breakdown for 2022 Lincoln Nautilus

Complete distribution of consumer defect reports across all 5 granular NHTSA system and subsystem classifications

Vehicle Component / System Total Complaints Crash Reports Fire Reports Injury Entries Fatality Entries
Structure & Body NHTSA category: STRUCTURE 5 0 0 0 0
Powertrain NHTSA category: POWER TRAIN 3 0 0 0 0
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,UNKNOWN OR OTHER 1 0 0 0 0
Forward Collision Avoidance NHTSA category: FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE 1 0 0 0 0
UNKNOWN OR OTHER,SERVICE BRAKES,ENGINE 1 1 0 0 0
Search Intelligence

Quick Answers: Common Problems & Reliability Questions for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus

Direct, deterministic answers synthesized from verified United States government databases for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus

What are the most common reported problems with the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus?

In official NHTSA consumer records, the most frequently cited issue area for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus is Body & Structure, appearing in 5 records (45.5% of submitted filings).

Secondary reported categories include Powertrain & Transmission (3) and Brakes & Traction Control (1).

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI)

Is the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus a reliable vehicle?

AutoUtility does not issue subjective reliability scores or commercial ratings. In official United States government records, NHTSA tracks 11 consumer defect complaints and 2 safety recall campaigns for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus.

Reviewing documented component complaint distributions, recall remedy notices, and active federal investigations provides an objective, evidence-based view of the vehicle's historical safety and defect record.

Source: NHTSA ODI & Safety Recalls Databases

Are there crash, fire, or injury reports associated with the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus?

Among consumer complaint records on file with NHTSA for the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus, 1 filing cites a crash, 0 cite smoke or fire, and 0 report one or more injuries.

Incident entries represent consumer descriptions at the time of submission to federal authorities and do not establish mechanical causation or legal liability.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Consumer Logs

Has NHTSA formally investigated defects on the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus?

NHTSA ODI records list 1 formal defect investigation involving the 2022 Lincoln Nautilus (all closed).

Federal defect investigations are formal engineering evaluations opened when safety defect trends emerge, and do not by themselves establish a confirmed defect or mandatory recall.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Registry
Official US Government Data Provenance

The complaint records on this page are retrieved directly from the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) public database under 49 CFR Part 576.

Local Production Store Compiled: August 2026 • Deterministic Audited Dataset • Zero Dynamic External API Runtime Latency.